| |

UPDATED: Cambodian Statue Forfeiture Agreement: Prosecutors Succeed, Sotheby’s Gains Concessions. What’s Next?

After a bitter court battle flared to new heights in September, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and Sotheby’s today proposed an agreement to repatriate…

| | |

Discovery Delay Asserted by Government as Sotheby’s Seeks Preliminary Court Hearing on Cambodian Ownership

Sotheby’s wants a preliminary hearing to argue the law, and the government wants more discovery from Sotheby’s to argue the facts. That continues to be the posture of the case…

| | |

“Claimants Deny Knowledge,” Affirmative Defenses Raised in Sotheby’s Cambodian Sculpture Case

“Claimants deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations set forth in … the Verified Complaint.” That is the refrain found in…

| | |

Cambodian Statue Forfeiture Case Moves Forward – Sotheby’s Motion to Dismiss is Denied

The federal district court for the southern district of New York today allowed federal prosecutors to amend their forfeiture complaint in the case of United States of America v. A…

| | |

“Maintaining Plausible Deniability”: Prosecutors in Sotheby’s Duryodhana Case Charge Sotheby’s with Avoiding Mention of the Alleged Theft of the Cambodian Statue

Prosecutors rebuked Sotheby’s last Friday, accusing the New York auction house in a reply memorandum of failing to disclose information it knew about a Duryodhana statue offered for sale this…

| | |

“The Government Now Relies on the Inherent Right of Kings,” Says Sotheby’s in Cambodian Statue Forfeiture Case

In a pointed and efficient twenty page legal memorandum filed Monday, lawyers for the claimants in United States of America v. A 10th Century Cambodian Sandstone Sculpture, Currently Located at…